Haney #211704 v. Honeywell et al
| Christopher Bryan Haney #211704 |
| Michael R. Honeywell, Jason Pattok, Don Willgus, Chelsea Kasul, Jackie Baker Sturgis and Kandyce Herr |
| 1:2021cv00056 |
| January 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $3.10 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
|
| Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Christopher Bryan Haney #211704 (ems) |
| Filing 3 CHANGE OF ADDRESS for plaintiff Christopher Bryan Haney #211704 to Charles Egeler Reception And Guidance Center (from Barry County Jail prior to complaint being received) (verified on MDOC website) (ems) |
| Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by plaintiff Christopher Bryan Haney #211704 (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (ems) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against Kandyce Herr, Michael R. Honeywell, Chelsea Kasul, Jason Pattok, Jackie Baker Sturgis, Don Willgus filed by Christopher Bryan Haney #211704 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (ems) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
