Tanner et al v. 933387 Ontario Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Chris Thomas Tanner and Mary Michele Tanner
Defendant: 933387 Ontario Ltd. d/b/a Remex Express and Ken M. Daehn
Case Number: 1:2021cv00209
Filed: March 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Phillip J Green
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Selected Mediator by plaintiff Mary Michele Tanner (Musbach, Randy)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: discovery to be completed by 10/29/2021; dispositive motions due by 11/30/2021; final pretrial conference set for 4/25/2022 at 10:00 AM at 601 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; jury trial set for 5/9/2022 at 08:30 AM at 601 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
April 20, 2021 Filing 13 MINUTES held before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green of Rule 16 scheduling conference via video; CMO to issue (Proceedings Digitally Recorded) (ald)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: discovery to be completed by 10/29/2021; dispositive motions due by 11/30/2021; final pretrial conference set for 4/25/2022 at 10:00 AM at 601 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; jury trial set for 5/9/2022 at 08:30 AM at 601 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER rescheduling Rule 16 conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 4/20/2021 at 02:00 PM by video before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER OF REFERENCE pursuant to consent of parties to dispositive jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge; case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
April 13, 2021 Filing 9 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Musbach, Randy)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 4/26/2021 at 01:30 PM at 401 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Janet T. Neff; joint status report due by 4/19/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
March 30, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by 933387 Ontario Ltd., Ken M. Daehn (Eads, John) Modified text on 4/2/2021 (mg).
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER striking answer #5 ; Defendants shall file a corrected answer no later than 7 days from the date of this Order; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
March 30, 2021 Filing 5 (STRICKEN) ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by 933387 Ontario Ltd., Ken M. Daehn (Eads, John) Modified text on 4/2/2021; stricken per #6 (mg).
March 30, 2021 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of John T. Eads, III on behalf of defendants 933387 Ontario Ltd., Ken M. Daehn (Eads, John)
March 9, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants 933387 Ontario Ltd., Ken M. Daehn (mg)
March 8, 2021 Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Inosencio, Bruce)
March 4, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (mg)
March 4, 2021 SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants 933387 Ontario Ltd., Ken M. Daehn (none provided) (mg)
March 4, 2021 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Randy A. Musbach on behalf of plaintiffs Chris Thomas Tanner, Mary Michele Tanner Co-Counsel (Musbach, Randy)
March 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Mary Michele Tanner, Chris Thomas Tanner (Inosencio, Bruce)
March 3, 2021 FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Chris Thomas Tanner, Mary Michele Tanner in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6364304 (Inosencio, Bruce)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tanner et al v. 933387 Ontario Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Thomas Tanner
Represented By: Bruce Allen Inosencio, Jr.
Represented By: Randy A. Musbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Michele Tanner
Represented By: Bruce Allen Inosencio, Jr.
Represented By: Randy A. Musbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 933387 Ontario Ltd. d/b/a Remex Express
Represented By: John T. Eads, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ken M. Daehn
Represented By: John T. Eads, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?