Butler v. Commissioner of Social Security
Claire Butler and Claire A. Butler |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
1:2021cv00225 |
March 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security served on 3/18/2021, answer due 5/17/2021 (ns) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and delivered to US Marshal for service (ns) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (ns) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Forbes, Randal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Claire Butler (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Forbes, Randal) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jason Scott Rodman on behalf of plaintiff Claire Butler (Rodman, Jason) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Randal Scott Forbes on behalf of plaintiff Claire Butler (Forbes, Randal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.