Ravitch v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Jonathon Paul Ravitch |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2021cv00244 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and delivered to US Marshal for service (jem) |
| Copy of Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Jonathon Paul Ravitch (jem) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (jem) |
| Copy of Order #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Jonathon Paul Ravitch (jmw) |
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff shall cure deficiency within 28 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of receipt of case (jem) |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #2 and blank IFP form sent via U.S. Mail to Jonathon Paul Ravitch (jem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Jonathon Paul Ravitch (Attachments: #1 Attachment Denial Letter) (jem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
