Nelson v. CE Power of Cincinnati, OH et al
| Nelson Gregory and Gregory Nelson |
| CE Power of Cincinnati, OH and American Electric Power |
| 1:2021cv00288 |
| March 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Janet T Neff |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting STIPULATION #13 ; Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and without attorneys' fees or costs; closing the case; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER of dismissal with prejudice and without costs or fees by defendant CE Power of Cincinnati, OH (Warren, Richard) Modified text on 5/28/2021 (ems). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER requiring dismissal papers to be filed no later than 6/1/2021; canceling 5/11/2021 Rule 16 scheduling conference; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 5/11/2021 at 01:30 PM at 401 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Janet T. Neff; joint status report due by 5/4/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand reliance by CE Power of Cincinnati, OH (Warren, Richard) Modified text on 4/15/2021 (ems). |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of DeAndre' Harris on behalf of defendant American Electric Power (Harris, DeAndre') |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Electric Power (Pacific, Dean) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to complaint with affirmative defenses by American Electric Power (Pacific, Dean) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING notice of removal re #1 directed to plaintiff by defendant American Electric Power (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Pacific, Dean) Modified text on 4/9/2021 (ems). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting stipulated proposed order #5 ; Defendant CE Power of Cincinnati, OH shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by no later than 4/14/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 5 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER extending time for defendant to respond to plaintiff's complaint by defendant CE Power of Cincinnati, OH (Warren, Richard) Modified text on 4/7/2021 (ems). |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CE Power of Cincinnati, OH identifying Corporate Parent Qualus Power Services for CE Power of Cincinnati, OH (Warren, Richard) |
| Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case #3 sent via U.S. Mail to attorney Dean F. Pacific (ems) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re corporate disclosure statement (ems) |
| Filing 2 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant CE Power of Cincinnati, OH re Notice of Removal #1 (Warren, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Cass County Circuit Court case number 21-000020-CD filed by CE Power of Cincinnati, OH (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Warren, Richard) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant CE Power of Cincinnati, OH in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6397463 (Warren, Richard) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Barbara A. Moore on behalf of defendant CE Power of Cincinnati, OH (Moore, Barbara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
