James #220570 v. Miniard
Petitioner: Quinn Anthony James #220570
Respondent: Gary Miniard
Case Number: 1:2021cv00348
Filed: April 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Sally J Berens
Referring Judge: Paul L Maloney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2021 Copy of Order to Proceed IFP on Appeal - Habeas #10 sent via U.S. Mail to Quinn Anthony James #220570 (ems)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL: petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis without payment of an appeal fee; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jln)
June 2, 2021 CASE NUMBER 21-1547 assigned by the Sixth Circuit to appeal #8 (mkc)
June 2, 2021 Filing 9 LETTER FROM CCA regarding appeal #8 indicating appeal has been docketed as USCA case number 21-1547 (ems)
June 1, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL re #7 by petitioner Quinn Anthony James #220570 (ems)
June 1, 2021 Copy of Notice of Appeal #8 and docket sheet sent via U.S. Mail to Quinn Anthony James #220570 (ems)
May 24, 2021 RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): filing fee installment in the amount of $5.00, receipt number GR074105; amount paid to date $5.00 (jem)
May 6, 2021 Filing 7 JUDGMENT dismissing habeas action under Rule 4; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying certificate of appealability; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc)
May 6, 2021 Filing 5 OPINION; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DENYING IFP: petitioner to pay the entire fee of $ 5.00 within 28 days or the case will be dismissed;(filing fee to be submitted by 6/3/2021); signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc)
May 6, 2021 Certified Copies of Order Denying Certificate of Appealability #6 , Order Denying IFP (Able to Pay - Habeas) #4 , Opinion (Screening) #5 , Judgment Dismissing Habeas Action Under Rule 4 #7 sent via U.S. Mail to Quinn Anthony James #220570 (ems)
April 26, 2021 Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit by petitioner Quinn Anthony James #220570 (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (ems)
April 26, 2021 Filing 2 BRIEF by petitioner Quinn Anthony James #220570 re #1 (titled as 'Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition of Writ of Habeas Corpus') (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Exhibit 1) (ems)
April 26, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Quinn Anthony James #220570 (ems)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James #220570 v. Miniard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Quinn Anthony James #220570
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Miniard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?