Dimplex Thermal Solutions, Inc. v. MRX Xtractors, LLC
Dimplex Thermal Solutions, Inc. |
MRX Xtractors, LLC |
1:2021cv00429 |
May 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Phillip J Green |
Hala Y Jarbou |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 11 MINUTES held before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green of Rule 16 scheduling conference via video; CMO to issue (Proceedings Digitally Recorded) (ald) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Nicholas John Spigiel on behalf of plaintiff Dimplex Thermal Solutions, Inc. Notice of Appearance of Stephen J. Hessen (Spigiel, Nicholas) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Stephen J. Hessen on behalf of plaintiff Dimplex Thermal Solutions, Inc. (Hessen, Stephen) |
Filing 10 NOTICE rescheduling hearing that was previously set for June 25, 2021; Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 6/24/2021 at 09:15 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; (jkw) |
Filing 9 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Marquis, Andrew) |
Filing 8 NOTICE re #6 Amended Notice of Removal by defendant MRX Xtractors, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A, #2 Exhibit Ex B) (Marquis, Andrew) |
|
|
Filing 5 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by MRX Xtractors, LLC (Marquis, Andrew) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying corporate parents Glen Electric Holdings GmbH, Belling Ltd., Glen Electric Limited, Glen Dimplex Europe Holdings Limited, and Kilkee Investments Unlimited for Dimplex Thermal Solutions, Inc. by plaintiff Dimplex Thermal Solutions, Inc. (Spigiel, Nicholas) Modified text on 5/26/2021 (mg). |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MRX Xtractors, LLC (Marquis, Andrew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Hala Y. Jarbou ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re corporate disclosure statement (ns) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kalamazoo County Circuit Court case number 21-000163-CK filed by MRX Xtractors, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Marquis, Andrew) Modified text on 5/25/2021 (ns). |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Andrew F. Marquis on behalf of defendant MRX Xtractors, LLC (Marquis, Andrew) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant MRX Xtractors, LLC in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6444015 (Marquis, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dimplex Thermal Solutions, Inc. v. MRX Xtractors, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MRX Xtractors, LLC | |
Represented By: | Andrew F. Marquis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dimplex Thermal Solutions, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Nicholas John Spigiel |
Represented By: | Stephen J. Hessen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.