Rankin v. Berrien, County of
| James R. Rankin |
| Berrien, County of |
| 1:2021cv00538 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for order for final judgment by plaintiff James R. Rankin; (slk) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION adding attorney Walter B. Fisher, Jr. in the place of Allan C. Vander Laan (Fisher, Walter) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to set aside default #6 with brief in support and certificate of service by defendant Berrien, County of; (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I) (Fisher, Walter) Modified text on 8/16/2021 (slk). |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Walter B. Fisher, Jr on behalf of defendant Berrien, County of (Fisher, Walter) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of John E. Dewane on behalf of defendant Berrien, County of (Dewane, John) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Kristen Lee Rewa on behalf of defendant Berrien, County of (Rewa, Kristen) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Allan C. Vander Laan on behalf of defendant Berrien, County of (Vander Laan, Allan) |
| Filing 6 DEFAULT ENTERED as to defendant Berrien, County of (ems) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for entry of default as to defendant Berrien, County of with proof of service (ems) Modified text on 8/2/2021 (ems). |
| Copy of Default (Entry of) #6 sent via U.S. Mail to James R. Rankin (ems) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS returned executed; Berrien, County of served on 7/2/2021, answer due 7/23/2021 (ems) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (ems) |
| Filing 2 Memorandum regarding potentially related case returned to Clerk from Magistrate Judge Green indicating that this case is related to case number 1:21-cv-119 (ems) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Berrien, County of and returned to plaintiff via mail (ems) Modified text on 6/25/2021 (ems). |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to James R. Rankin (ems) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Berrien, County of filed by James R. Rankin (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Proposed Summons) (ems) |
| RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number KZ004306; for filing fee (ems) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rankin v. Berrien, County of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James R. Rankin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Berrien, County of | |
| Represented By: | Allan C. Vander Laan |
| Represented By: | John E. Dewane |
| Represented By: | Kristen Lee Rewa |
| Represented By: | Walter B. Fisher, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
