Churn #165703 v. Black et al
Ladon Churn #165703 |
Unknown Howard, Unknown Bledsoe and Unknown Black |
1:2021cv00540 |
June 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Robert J Jonker |
Ray Kent |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): initial filing fee installment in the amount of $402.00, receipt number GR074726; amount paid to date $402.00 (tlbu) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT re AMENDED MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 by plaintiff Ladon Churn #165703 (mg) |
Filing 4 AMENDED MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Ladon Churn #165703; (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents, #2 letter) (eod) |
Copy of Order Denying IFP (Able to Pay - Prisoner Civil Rights) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Ladon Churn #165703 (pjw) |
Filing 3 ORDER DENYING IFP: plaintiff to pay the entire fee of $400.00 within 28 days or the case will be dismissed;(filing fee to be submitted by 8/25/2021); signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (mg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against Unknown Black, Unknown Bledsoe, Unknown Howard filed by Ladon Churn #165703 (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.