Schema v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
| Pamala Schema |
| State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 1:2021cv00727 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Janet T Neff |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of dismissal by plaintiff Pamala Schema [Attorney Matthew D. Klakulak added to party Pamala Schema(pty:pla)] (Klakulak, Matthew) |
Filing 9
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 9/22/2021 at 10:00 AM at 401 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Janet T. Neff; joint status report due by 9/15/2021; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw)
|
| Filing 8 Revised Per W.D. Mich. LCivR 8.2 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Schmidt, Michael) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent State Auto Financial Corporation for State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Schmidt, Michael) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING by defendant State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company re Notice of Removal #1 (Schmidt, Michael) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING by defendant State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company re Notice of Removal #1 (Schmidt, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Hon. Janet T. Neff with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re notice of filing notice of removal and corporate disclosure statement (jem) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company re Answer to Complaint (Petition for Removal) #2 (Schmidt, Michael) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Schmidt, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ingham County Circuit Court case number 2021-467-NO filed by State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint) (Schmidt, Michael) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6519335 (Schmidt, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schema v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pamala Schema | |
| Represented By: | Robert M. Giroux, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Matthew D. Klakulak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael F. Schmidt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
