Molina-Clark v. Concepcion et al
| Damien Molina-Clark |
| Juan Concepcion and Patrick Herson |
| 1:2021cv00804 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Janet T Neff |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Damien Molina-Clark as to Patrick Herson waiver sent on 10/28/2021, answer due 12/27/2021 (Basiga, Brendon) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Damien Molina-Clark as to Juan Concepcion waiver sent on 10/28/2021, answer due 12/27/2021 (Basiga, Brendon) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Christopher James Raiti on behalf of defendants Juan Concepcion, Patrick Herson (Raiti, Christopher) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of G. Gus Morris on behalf of defendants Juan Concepcion, Patrick Herson (Morris, G.) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Juan Concepcion, Patrick Herson (mlc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (mlc) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Basiga, Brendon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Damien Molina-Clark (Basiga, Brendon) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Damien Molina-Clark in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6543670 (Basiga, Brendon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
