Jones #303826 v. Kent, County of et al
HC Lee Jones #303826 |
Kent, County of, William Mendez and Brandyn Westen |
1:2021cv00847 |
September 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Sally J Berens |
Hala Y Jarbou |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Copy of Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge #5 sent via U.S. Mail to HC Lee Jones (mlc) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks) |
Filing 4 DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 10/28/2021 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jln) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (ems) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit by plaintiff HC Lee Jones #303826 (signature as taken from Cover Letter from Complaint #1 ) (ems) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (signature as taken from Cover Letter) against Kent, County of, William Mendez, Brandyn Westen filed by HC Lee Jones #303826 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Cover Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ems) |
Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to HC Lee Jones #303826 (ems) |
Copy of Deficiency Order, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to HC Lee Jones #303826 (ems) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.