Nessel v. Smith et al
Dana Nessel |
Michael Smolich, Roger Smith, Bump City Wine Co, Roger Smith doing business as Bump City Wine Co. and Michael Smolich doing business as Bump City Wine Co. |
1:2021cv00887 |
October 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Sally J Berens |
Hala Y Jarbou |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED UNEXECUTED as to Roger Smith & Michael Smolich, filed by defendants Roger Smith, Michael Smolich, WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Dana Nessel as to All Defendants; waivers sent 10/22/2021, due dates 12/21/2021 (Hall, Felepe) Modified text on 11/22/2021 (ems). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Roger Smith, Michael Smolich (ems) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Hala Y. Jarbou (ems) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Hall, Felepe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions against All Defendants filed by Dana Nessel (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Cease & Desist Letters, #2 Exhibit 2-Order Documentation, #3 Exhibit 3-Package Photo of Order, #4 Exhibit 4- Return Label) (Hall, Felepe) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Dana Nessel in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6569547 (Hall, Felepe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.