C A T Transport, Inc. v. Gwillim et al
Plaintiff: C A T Transport, Inc.
Defendant: Tyler Gwillim and Mickey Gwillim
Case Number: 1:2021cv00994
Filed: November 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Ray Kent
Referring Judge: Paul L Maloney
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction by defendants Mickey Gwillim, Tyler Gwillim; (Verticchio, Rick)
January 12, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER to complaint, #1 by Mickey Gwillim, Tyler Gwillim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Verticchio, Rick) Modified text on 1/13/2022 (slk).
January 12, 2022 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Rick Verticchio on behalf of defendants Mickey Gwillim, Tyler Gwillim (Verticchio, Rick)
December 20, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed; Tyler Gwillim served on 12/11/2021, answer due 1/3/2022 (Hoesch, Timothy)
December 20, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed; Mickey Gwillim served on 12/11/2021, answer due 1/3/2022 (Hoesch, Timothy)
November 24, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS REISSUED as to defendant Mickey Gwillim (slk) Modified text on 11/24/2021 (slk).
November 24, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS REISSUED as to defendant Tyler Gwillim (slk) Modified text on 11/24/2021 (slk).
November 24, 2021 Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Hoesch, Timothy)
November 24, 2021 Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Hoesch, Timothy)
November 24, 2021 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by C A T Transport, Inc. (Hoesch, Timothy)
November 23, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Mickey Gwillim, Tyler Gwillim (slk)
November 23, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re corporate disclosure statement (slk)
November 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by C A T Transport, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons) (Hoesch, Timothy) Modified text on 11/23/2021 (slk).
November 23, 2021 RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number AMIWDC-6602739; filing fee paid by attorney Timothy A. Hoesch on behalf of plaintiff (jmw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: C A T Transport, Inc. v. Gwillim et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C A T Transport, Inc.
Represented By: Timothy A. Hoesch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyler Gwillim
Represented By: Rick Verticchio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mickey Gwillim
Represented By: Rick Verticchio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?