Barron #322902 v. Macauley
| Christopher Barron #322902 |
| Matt Macauley |
| 1:2022cv00107 |
| February 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
LETTER from Christopher Barron to Judge Berens (slk)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting Petitioner's motion to stay #3 ; denying Petitioner's motion for order to apply equitable tolling #5 ; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jln)
|
|
Filing 11
OPINION; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jln)
|
|
Copy of Opinion (Screening) #11 , Order on Motion to Stay, Order on Motion for Order #12 sent via U.S. Mail to Christopher Barron #322902 (ns)
|
|
Filing 10
STATEMENT RE CONSENT by petitioner Christopher Barron #322902 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (ems)
|
|
Filing 9
EXHIBIT re #1 by petitioner Christopher Barron #322902 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Attachment 6, #7 Attachment 7, #8 Attachment 8, #9 Attachment 9, #10 Attachment 10) (ems)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE to petitioner regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 2/24/2022 (ems)
|
|
Filing 7
AFFIDAVIT re #5 , #6 in support of the motion seeking equitable tolling by petitioner Christopher Barron #322902 (ems)
|
|
Filing 6
BRIEF in support of MOTION for order to apply equitable tolling #5 filed by Christopher Barron #322902 (ems)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for order to apply equitable tolling by petitioner Christopher Barron #322902; (ems)
|
|
Filing 4
BRIEF in support of MOTION to stay re #1 proceedings and hold petition in abeyance #3 filed by Christopher Barron #322902 (ems)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to stay re #1 proceedings and hold petition in abeyance by petitioner Christopher Barron #322902; (ems)
|
|
Filing 2
BRIEF by petitioner Christopher Barron #322902 re #1 in support of petition for writ of habeas corpus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (ems)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Christopher Barron #322902 (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (ems)
|
|
RECEIPT: filing fee in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number KZ004387 (ems)
|
|
Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #8 sent via U.S. Mail to Christopher Barron #322902 (ems)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barron #322902 v. Macauley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Christopher Barron #322902 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Matt Macauley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
