Martin #413601 v. Randall et al
Plaintiff: Rickey Lee Martin #413601
Defendant: Unknown Randall, Unknown Roberts and Unknown Bennet
Case Number: 1:2022cv00123
Filed: February 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Robert J Jonker
Referring Judge: Ray Kent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2022 RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): filing fee installment in the amount of $1.66, receipt number GR076610; amount paid to date $1.66 (jmw)
March 10, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker and Magistrate Judge Ray Kent for all further proceedings (pjw)
March 10, 2022 Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case to DJ (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Rickey Lee Martin #413601 (pjw)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $1.66 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
February 11, 2022 Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Rickey Lee Martin #413601 (eod)
February 10, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 3/3/2022 (pjw)
February 10, 2022 Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Rickey Lee Martin #413601 (pjw)
February 9, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to appoint counsel by plaintiff Rickey Lee Martin #413601; (pjw)
February 9, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (pjw)
February 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Rickey Lee Martin #413601 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7) (pjw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin #413601 v. Randall et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rickey Lee Martin #413601
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Randall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Bennet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?