Chenge v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
| Augustine Chenge |
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Rochelle P. Walensky, Sherri A. Berger, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg, Joseph Biden and United States of America |
| 1:2022cv00165 |
| February 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 consent motion for extension of time to answer; Defendants shall file an answer no later than 5/26/2022; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re CONSENT MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 (Complaint) #8 filed by Xavier Becerra, Sherri A. Berger, Joseph Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Rochelle P. Walensky (Gerardi, Michael) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 (Complaint) by defendants Xavier Becerra, Sherri A. Berger, Joseph Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Rochelle P. Walensky; (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gerardi, Michael) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Michael J. Gerardi on behalf of defendants Xavier Becerra, Sherri A. Berger, Joseph Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Rochelle P. Walensky (Gerardi, Michael) |
| Copy of Order on Motion for Leave to File and Receive Notice Electronically #7 sent via U.S. Mail to Augustine Chenge (mg) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 motion for leave to file and receive notice electronically; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
|
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Augustine Chenge re PRO SE MOTION for leave to file and receive service electronically #5 (mg) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION for leave to file and receive service electronically by plaintiff Augustine Chenge; (mg) |
| Copy of Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Augustine Chenge (ns) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (ns) |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Augustine Chenge (ns) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE APPLICATION for electronic filing and service by plaintiff Augustine Chenge (ns) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Augustine Chenge (ns) |
| RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number GR076245; for filing fee (ns) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Xavier Becerra, Sherri A. Berger, Joseph Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, Rochelle P. Walensky, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ns) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
