Lynd v. Amazon.com Services LLC
| Vanessa Lynd |
| Amazon.com Services LLC |
| Facilitative Mediator |
| 1:2022cv00291 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| VFM FEE RECEIVED in the amount of $25.00, check number 0146 as to plaintiff Vanessa Lynd (kmd) |
| VFM FEE RECEIVED in the amount of $25.00, check number 30676 as to defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (kmd) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of appointment of Facilitative Mediator Craig R. Noland; plaintiff VFM fee to be submitted by 5/25/2022 defendant VFM fee to be submitted by 5/25/2022 (kmd) |
| Filing 12 SELECTION of Craig R. Noland as facilitative mediator by plaintiff Vanessa Lynd (Wilkinson, Mark) |
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: discovery to be completed by 11/1/2022; dispositive motions due by 12/1/2022; settlement conference set for 1/4/2023 at 9:30 AM at 499 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; final pretrial conference set for 2/2/2023 at 10:00 AM at 128 Federal Building, Lansing, MI before District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou; jury trial set for 2/28/2023 at 9:00 AM at 128 Federal Building, Lansing, MI before District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Vanessa Lynd for her first set of interrogatories, first request to produce, and first request to admit (Wilkinson, Mark) |
| Filing 9 MINUTES of scheduling conference; held before District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (Court Reporter: Genevieve Hamlin) (aks) |
| Filing 8 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Wilkinson, Mark) |
| Filing 7 (RESTRICTED ACCESS) DOCUMENT Videoconference Information for 5/5/2022 hearing. RECORDING OR BROADCASTING OF THIS PROCEEDING IS PROHIBITED. W.D. Mich. LGenR 4.1(c)(i) and (ii). [Access to this document is available to the Court and attorney(s) for Amazon.com Services LLC, Vanessa Lynd only] (aks) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 5/5/2022 at 1:30 PM by video before District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou; status report due by 4/28/2022; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by Amazon.com Services LLC (Chichester, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Hala Y. Jarbou (eod) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING notice of removal re #1 directed to Kent County Circuit Court by defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Chichester, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Amazon.com Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Amazon.com, Inc., Other Affiliate Amazon.com Sales, Inc. for Amazon.com Services LLC (Chichester, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kent County Circuit Court case number 22-01666-CD filed by Amazon.com Services LLC with state court summons and complaint (Chichester, Michael) Modified text on 3/29/2022 (eod) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant Amazon.com Services LLC in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6705785 (Chichester, Michael) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Saniya Khare on behalf of defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (Khare, Saniya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
