Cosgrove v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Nancy I. Cosgrove (formerly Kennedy), Nancy I. Cosgrove and Nancy Kennedy |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv00315 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of Social Security Decision (RSI) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mg)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (mg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT to Review Decision of Commissioner of Social Security Administration against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Nancy I. Cosgrove (formerly Kennedy) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Forbes, Randal)
|
|
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Randal Scott Forbes on behalf of plaintiff Nancy I. Cosgrove (formerly Kennedy) (Forbes, Randal)
|
|
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Nancy I. Cosgrove (formerly Kennedy) in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6709587 (Forbes, Randal)
|
|
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jason Scott Rodman on behalf of plaintiff Nancy I. Cosgrove (formerly Kennedy) (Rodman, Jason)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
