Roach v. Bates et al
Plaintiff: Bree Roach
Defendant: Sierra Bates, Brian Hastings, Benzie, County of and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 1:2022cv00435
Filed: May 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Ray Kent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2022 Filing 16 MINUTES of scheduling conference by telephone held before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; case management order to issue (Proceedings Not Digitally Recorded) (sjc)
July 8, 2022 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Andrew James Brege on behalf of defendants Sierra Bates, Benzie, County of, Brian Hastings (Brege, Andrew)
July 5, 2022 Filing 15 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Jones, Michael)
July 5, 2022 Filing 14 RESPONSE in opposition to MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim in Lieu of Answer with Proof of Service #10 filed by Bree Roach (Jones, Michael)
June 17, 2022 Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Bree Roach as to Brian Hastings waiver sent on 6/16/2022, answer due 8/15/2022 (Jones, Michael)
June 14, 2022 Filing 12 Index of Unpublished Authority EXHIBIT re #10 Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer by defendant Benzie, County of (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Annabel v Heyns, #2 Exhibit 2 - Bonds v Sourthern Health Partners, Inc, #3 Exhibit 3 - Est. of Abbey v Herring, #4 Exhibit 4 - Kukoleck v Lake County Sheriff's Office, #5 Exhibit 5 - Mitchell v Cty of Ottawa, #6 Exhibit 6 - Ronayne v Ficano, #7 Exhibit 7 - Ruiz-Bueno v Scott, #8 Exhibit 8 - Winburn v Davis, #9 Exhibit 9 - Wooler v Hickman Cty. Kentucky) (Beindit, Thomas)
June 14, 2022 Filing 11 BRIEF in support of MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim in Lieu of Answer with Proof of Service #10 filed by Benzie, County of (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Court Records, #2 Exhibit 2 - Transcript, #3 Exhibit 3 - CMH Document, #4 Exhibit 4 - MSP Report, #5 Exhibit 5 - Pod Logs) (Beindit, Thomas)
June 14, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim in Lieu of Answer with Proof of Service by defendant Benzie, County of; (Beindit, Thomas)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone: telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 7/8/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; status report due by 7/5/2022; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
June 6, 2022 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Bree Roach as to Sierra Bates waiver sent on 6/6/2022, answer due 8/5/2022 (Jones, Michael)
June 6, 2022 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Thomas David Beindit on behalf of defendants Sierra Bates, Benzie, County of, Brian Hastings (Beindit, Thomas)
May 31, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed; Benzie, County of served on 5/25/2022, answer due 6/15/2022 (Jones, Michael)
May 16, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE re #4 Plaintiff's Statement Regarding Consent by plaintiff Bree Roach (Jones, Michael)
May 16, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Sierra Bates, Benzie, County of, Brian Hastings, Unknown Parties (mg)
May 16, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 6/6/2022 (mg)
May 13, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE regarding reassignment of case from Northern Division 2:22-cv-100 to Southern Division per Administrative Order 11-035; all future filings should reflect the NEW CASE NUMBER of 1:22-cv-435 (jlg)
May 13, 2022 Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Jones, Michael)
May 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Bree Roach (Jones, Michael)
May 13, 2022 FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Bree Roach in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6742654 (Jones, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roach v. Bates et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bree Roach
Represented By: Michael L. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sierra Bates
Represented By: Andrew James Brege
Represented By: Thomas David Beindit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Hastings
Represented By: Andrew James Brege
Represented By: Thomas David Beindit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benzie, County of
Represented By: Andrew James Brege
Represented By: Thomas David Beindit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?