Roach v. Bates et al
Bree Roach |
Sierra Bates, Brian Hastings, Benzie, County of and Unknown Parties |
1:2022cv00435 |
May 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MINUTES of scheduling conference by telephone held before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; case management order to issue (Proceedings Not Digitally Recorded) (sjc) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Andrew James Brege on behalf of defendants Sierra Bates, Benzie, County of, Brian Hastings (Brege, Andrew) |
Filing 15 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Jones, Michael) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in opposition to MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim in Lieu of Answer with Proof of Service #10 filed by Bree Roach (Jones, Michael) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Bree Roach as to Brian Hastings waiver sent on 6/16/2022, answer due 8/15/2022 (Jones, Michael) |
Filing 12 Index of Unpublished Authority EXHIBIT re #10 Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer by defendant Benzie, County of (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Annabel v Heyns, #2 Exhibit 2 - Bonds v Sourthern Health Partners, Inc, #3 Exhibit 3 - Est. of Abbey v Herring, #4 Exhibit 4 - Kukoleck v Lake County Sheriff's Office, #5 Exhibit 5 - Mitchell v Cty of Ottawa, #6 Exhibit 6 - Ronayne v Ficano, #7 Exhibit 7 - Ruiz-Bueno v Scott, #8 Exhibit 8 - Winburn v Davis, #9 Exhibit 9 - Wooler v Hickman Cty. Kentucky) (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 11 BRIEF in support of MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim in Lieu of Answer with Proof of Service #10 filed by Benzie, County of (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Court Records, #2 Exhibit 2 - Transcript, #3 Exhibit 3 - CMH Document, #4 Exhibit 4 - MSP Report, #5 Exhibit 5 - Pod Logs) (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 10 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim in Lieu of Answer with Proof of Service by defendant Benzie, County of; (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 9 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone: telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 7/8/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; status report due by 7/5/2022; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Bree Roach as to Sierra Bates waiver sent on 6/6/2022, answer due 8/5/2022 (Jones, Michael) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Thomas David Beindit on behalf of defendants Sierra Bates, Benzie, County of, Brian Hastings (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed; Benzie, County of served on 5/25/2022, answer due 6/15/2022 (Jones, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE re #4 Plaintiff's Statement Regarding Consent by plaintiff Bree Roach (Jones, Michael) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Sierra Bates, Benzie, County of, Brian Hastings, Unknown Parties (mg) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 6/6/2022 (mg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE regarding reassignment of case from Northern Division 2:22-cv-100 to Southern Division per Administrative Order 11-035; all future filings should reflect the NEW CASE NUMBER of 1:22-cv-435 (jlg) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Jones, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Bree Roach (Jones, Michael) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Bree Roach in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6742654 (Jones, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.