Taylor v. Active Interest Media, Inc.
| Jason Taylor |
| Active Interest Media, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00447 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending answer deadline to 8/19/2022; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER regarding Extending Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by defendant Active Interest Media, Inc. (Schley, Carol) |
| Filing 10 (RESTRICTED ACCESS) DOCUMENT Videoconference Information for 7/19/2022 hearing. RECORDING OR BROADCASTING OF THIS PROCEEDING IS PROHIBITED. W.D. Mich. LGenR 4.1(c)(i) and (ii). [Access to this document is available to the Court and attorney(s) for Active Interest Media, Inc., Jason Taylor only] (aks) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of status conference set for 7/19/2022 at 1:30 PM by video before District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou; (aks) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Kristen Rodriguez on behalf of defendant Active Interest Media, Inc. (Rodriguez, Kristen) |
|
Filing 8
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER No. 22-CA-055 that this case is reassigned to District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou and Magistrate Judge Ray Kent for all further proceedings ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (mg)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER; deadline for defendant to file response to complaint extended to 7/22/2022; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by defendant Active Interest Media, Inc. (Schley, Carol) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Carol G. Schley on behalf of defendant Active Interest Media, Inc. (Schley, Carol) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Peter B. Kupelian on behalf of defendant Active Interest Media, Inc. (Kupelian, Peter) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Philip L. Fraietta on behalf of plaintiff Jason Taylor (Fraietta, Philip) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; Active Interest Media, Inc. served on 5/23/2022, answer due 6/13/2022 (Miller, E.) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Frank S. Hedin on behalf of plaintiff Jason Taylor (Hedin, Frank) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Gregory A. Mitchell on behalf of plaintiff Jason Taylor (Mitchell, Gregory) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Sharon S. Almonrode on behalf of plaintiff Jason Taylor (Almonrode, Sharon) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Active Interest Media, Inc. (ems) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (ems) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Miller, E.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand (Class Action Complaint) against Active Interest Media, Inc. filed by Jason Taylor (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q) (Miller, E.) Modified text on 5/17/2022 (ems). |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Jason Taylor in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6745325 (Miller, E.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
