Davis v. First National Bank of America et al
| Horace J Davis and Horace Davis |
| First National Bank of America and First National Acceptance Company |
| 1:2022cv00657 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (pjw) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants First National Acceptance Company, First National Bank of America (none provided) (pjw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Horace Davis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Mortgage, #2 Exhibit 2 Mortgage, #3 Exhibit 3 November 1, 2021 letter, #4 Exhibit 4 Quit Claim for Deed in Lieu, #5 Exhibit 5 MIHAF Partners List, #6 Exhibit 6 MIHAF Email Confirmation, #7 Exhibit 7 MIHAF Denial Lender Refuses Money, #8 Exhibit 8 June 13, 2022, Letter of Intent to Foreclose, #9 Exhibit 9 February 10, 2022, Mortgage Statement, #10 Exhibit 10 Notice of Foreclosure, #11 Exhibit 11 Affidavit of Horace J. Davis, #12 Exhibit 12 CFR 1024.41, #13 Exhibit 13 CFR 1024.35, #14 Exhibit 14 CFR 1024.38) (Fluker, Vanessa) Modified text on 7/21/2022 (pjw) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Horace J Davis in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6796875 (Fluker, Vanessa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
