Mavinga v. Mayorkas et al
Fidele Mavinga |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Kenneth S. Madsen, Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
1:2022cv00711 |
August 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Robert J Jonker |
Ray Kent |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed on All Defendants, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit) (Asch, Marc) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Department of Homeland Security, Ur M. Jaddou, Kenneth S. Madsen, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (eod) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Asch, Marc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Robert J. Jonker (eod) |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Department of Homeland Security, Ur M. Jaddou, Kenneth S. Madsen, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (none provided) (eod) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Fidele Mavinga (Asch, Marc) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Fidele Mavinga in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6811163 (Asch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.