Cote v. Alcon Industries, Inc.
Michael Cote |
Alcon Industries, Inc. |
1:2022cv00728 |
August 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Hala Y Jarbou |
Ray Kent |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 18 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER for dismissal with prejudice and without costs by defendant Alcon Industries, Inc. (Ryan, Timothy) Modified text on 12/14/2022 (mlc). |
|
Filing 16 MINUTES of early settlement conference held before Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens; case settled; order re dismissal documents to issue (Portions Digitally Recorded) (jln) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Michael Cote for Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures (Glazier, Bradley) |
Filing 14 (RESTRICTED ACCESS) DOCUMENT Videoconference information for 11/29/2022 hearing [Access to this document is available to the Court and attorney(s) for Alcon Industries, Inc., Michael Cote only] (jln) |
|
Filing 12 MINUTES of scheduling conference by telephone held before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; case management order to issue (Proceedings Not Digitally Recorded) (sjc) |
|
Filing 10 JOINT STATUS REPORT Rule 16 Scheduling Conference (Glazier, Bradley) |
Filing 9 NOTICE rescheduling hearing that was previously set for 10/7/2022 at 10:00 AM; telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 10/12/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; (fhw) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Alcon Industries, Inc. (Ryan, Timothy) |
|
Filing 6 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by Alcon Industries, Inc. (Ryan, Timothy) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE on behalf of Alcon Industries, Inc. served on 8/16/2022, answer due 9/6/2022 (Glazier, Bradley) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Timothy J. Ryan on behalf of defendant Alcon Industries, Inc. (Ryan, Timothy) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Robert Michael Howard on behalf of plaintiff Michael Cote (Howard, Robert) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Alcon Industries, Inc. (mlc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Hala Y. Jarbou (mlc) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Glazier, Bradley) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Alcon Industries, Inc. filed by Michael Cote (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Glazier, Bradley) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Michael Cote in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6815043 (Glazier, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cote v. Alcon Industries, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Cote | |
Represented By: | Bradley K. Glazier |
Represented By: | Robert Michael Howard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Alcon Industries, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Timothy J. Ryan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.