Tiedel v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Michael Tiedel
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2022cv00746
Filed: August 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Phillip J Green
Referring Judge: Paul L Maloney
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2022 Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Kersting, Edna)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: defendant shall file administrative record by 10/27/2022; plaintiff's brief on the merits due 12/22/2022; defendant's brief on the merits due 2/16/2023; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company file a corporate disclosure statement within 7 days; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
September 27, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Kersting, Edna)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 motion for extension of time to answer; deadline extended to 9/27/2022; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
September 13, 2022 Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company; (Kersting, Edna)
September 13, 2022 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Edna Sybil Kersting on behalf of defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Kersting, Edna)
August 31, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company served on 8/23/2022, answer due 9/13/2022 (Attachments: #1 copy of certified mail return receipt card) (Haney, Troy)
August 19, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (eod)
August 19, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (eod)
August 18, 2022 Filing 2 CASE ASSIGNMENT REVIEW indicating the cases are related; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
August 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company filed by Michael Tiedel (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Haney, Troy)
August 16, 2022 FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Michael Tiedel in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6818796 (Haney, Troy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tiedel v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Tiedel
Represented By: Troy W. Haney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Edna Sybil Kersting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?