Perkins v. Motorcars of Lansing, Inc.
Hannah Perkins |
Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. |
1:2022cv00751 |
August 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Jane M Beckering |
Sally J Berens |
Other Fraud |
49 U.S.C. ยง 32710 Odometer Tampering |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw) |
Filing 14 MINUTES of scheduling conference by telephone held before District Judge Jane M. Beckering (Court Reporter: not recorded) (rmw) |
Filing 13 (RESTRICTED ACCESS) DOCUMENT (instructions for 10/14/2022 telephonic scheduling conference) [Access to this document is available to the Court and attorney(s) for Motorcars of Lansing, Inc., Hannah Perkins only] (rmw) |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) planning meeting (Joint Status Report) (Taub, Adam) |
Filing 11 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 10/14/2022 at 10:00 AM by telephone before District Judge Jane M. Beckering; joint status report due by 10/7/2022; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Amended Complaint #9 with jury demand by Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Corporate Disclosure) (Maddaloni, Michael) Modified text on 9/21/2022 (eod) |
Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. filed by Hannah Perkins (Taub, Adam) |
Filing 8 ORDER that Defendant file a corporate disclosure statement within 7 days; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw) |
Filing 7 ORDER striking answer #6 ; Defendant shall file a corrected answer no later than 7 days from the date of this Order; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw) |
Filing 6 (STRICKEN) ANSWER to complaint #1 by Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proof of Service) (Maddaloni, Michael) Modified text on 9/13/2022, per Order #7 (eod) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. served on 8/22/2022, answer due 9/12/2022 (Taub, Adam) Modified text on 8/31/2022 (eod) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. (eod) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Jane M. Beckering (eod) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Taub, Adam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. filed by Hannah Perkins (Taub, Adam) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Hannah Perkins in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6820181 (Taub, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Perkins v. Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Hannah Perkins | |
Represented By: | Adam G. Taub |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Motorcars of Lansing, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael T. Maddaloni |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.