Rashada #493950 v. Odungua et al
| Webster Rashada #493950 |
| Unknown Odungua, Unknown Rees, Unknown Montoya, Unknown Ledesma and Unknown Dunn |
| 1:2022cv01017 |
| October 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CHANGE OF ADDRESS for plaintiff Webster Rashada #493950 to Marquette Branch Prison (ems) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis without payment of an initial partial filing fee; plaintiff to remain liable for the filing fee as funds become available; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
| Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Without Payment of Initial Fee - Prisoner, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Webster Rashada #493950 (jrg) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (jrg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Webster Rashada #493950 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I) (jrg) |
| STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Webster Rashada #493950 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge Kent (jrg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
