Lanoue #725348 v. Simons et al
| Joseph Lanoue #725348 |
| Unknown Simons and Unknown Hicks |
| 1:2022cv01111 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
LETTER from Joseph Lanoue #725348 requesting appeal forms (Attachments: #1 Response from Clerk) (eod)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to amend/correct #1 by plaintiff Joseph Lanoue #725348; (eod)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $2.03 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
|
Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Joseph Lanoue #725348 (eod)
|
|
Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Joseph Lanoue #725348 (eod)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of receipt of case (eod)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (eod)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Unknown Hicks, Unknown Simons filed by Joseph Lanoue #725348 (eod)
|
|
STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Joseph Lanoue #725348 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (eod)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
