Tungate v. L. Perrigo Company
| Kelly Tungate |
| L. Perrigo Company |
| 1:2022cv01145 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by L. Perrigo Company identifying Corporate Parent Perrigo Company, Corporate Parent Perrigo Company, PLC, Corporate Parent Perrigo American Holdings, Inc. for L. Perrigo Company (Trombley, Jarrod) |
Filing 10
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone: telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 2/21/2023 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Paul L. Maloney; status report due by 2/15/2023; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER that defendant L. Perrigo Company file a corporate disclosure statement within 7 days; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 8 Defendant Perrigo's ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by L. Perrigo Company (Trombley, Jarrod) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER approving STIPULATION #6 ; deadline to answer complaint extended to 1/13/2023; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline for Filing Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by defendant L. Perrigo Company (Trombley, Jarrod) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Edward J. Bardelli on behalf of defendant L. Perrigo Company (Bardelli, Edward) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jarrod Howard Trombley on behalf of defendant L. Perrigo Company (Trombley, Jarrod) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; L. Perrigo Company served on 12/8/2022, answer due 12/29/2022 (Howard, Robert) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant L. Perrigo Company (mg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Paul L. Maloney (mg) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Glazier, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against L. Perrigo Company filed by Kelly Tungate (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Glazier, Bradley) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Kelly Tungate in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6914715 (Glazier, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tungate v. L. Perrigo Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelly Tungate | |
| Represented By: | Bradley K. Glazier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: L. Perrigo Company | |
| Represented By: | Edward J. Bardelli |
| Represented By: | Jarrod Howard Trombley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
