Thomas et al v. TJX Companies, Inc., The et al
| Ernestine Thomas and William Thomas |
| The TJX Companies, Inc., Jane Doe, TJX Companies, Inc., The and TJ Maxx |
| 1:2022cv01164 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Ray Kent |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: discovery to be completed by 10/27/2023; dispositive motions due by 11/27/2023; early settlement conference set for 11/2/2023 at 01:30 PM at 584 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; settlement conference set for 4/9/2024 at 01:30 PM at 584 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; final pretrial conference set for 4/24/2024 at 10:00 AM at 128 Federal Building, Lansing, MI before Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou; jury trial set for 5/21/2024 at 09:00 AM at 128 Federal Building, Lansing, MI before Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
|
Filing 8
(DISREGARD) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: discovery to be completed by 10/27/2023; dispositive motions due by 11/27/2023; early settlement conference set for 11/2/2023 at 01:30 PM at 584 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; settlement conference set for 8/9/2024 at 01:30 PM at 584 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; final pretrial conference set for 4/24/2024 at 10:00 AM at 128 Federal Building, Lansing, MI before Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou; jury trial set for 5/21/2024 at 09:00 AM at 128 Federal Building, Lansing, MI before Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw) Modified text on 1/23/2023 (slk).
|
|
(NON-DOCUMENT) NOTICE that Case Management Order,, #8 was filed in error and should be disregarded (fhw)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTES of scheduling conference by telephone held before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; case management order to issue (Proceedings Not Digitally Recorded) (sjc)
|
|
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Michael A. Kowalko on behalf of plaintiffs Ernestine Thomas, William Thomas (Kowalko, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
JOINT STATUS REPORT for January 19, 2023 Rule 16 Scheduling Conference (Gillooly, John)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone: telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 1/19/2023 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; status report due by 1/13/2023; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by TJX Companies, Inc., The (Gillooly, John)
|
|
Filing 3
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by TJX Companies, Inc., The (Gillooly, John)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Hala Y. Jarbou ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee re corporate disclosure statement (slk)
|
|
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant TJX Companies, Inc., The in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6919763 (Gillooly, John)
|
|
Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Thomas William Waun (slk)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Attachments from Berrien County Circuit Court case number 22-0246-NO filed by TJX Companies, Inc., The (Gillooly, John) Modified text on 12/8/2022 (slk).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
