Cooley et al v. Marcus
| James Cooley and Morgan Cooley |
| Elizabeth Marcus |
| 1:2023cv00086 |
| January 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Ray Kent |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
JOINT STATUS REPORT (Zietlow, Mark)
|
|
Filing 18
CERTIFICATE of compliance re word count for Reply to Response to Motion #17 filed by Elizabeth Marcus (Hubbard, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 17
REPLY to response to motion #8 Reply in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by Elizabeth Marcus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Hubbard, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 16
VERIFICATION STATEMENT re #15 , #14 by plaintiffs James Cooley, Morgan Cooley (Zietlow, Mark)
|
|
Filing 15
RESPONSE TO MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) #8 filed by Morgan Cooley (Zietlow, Mark)
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE TO MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) #8 filed by James Cooley (Zietlow, Mark)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone: telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 3/27/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Ray Kent; status report due by 3/22/2023; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
|
Filing 12
EXHIBIT re #9 Exhibit 6 by defendant Elizabeth Marcus (eod)
|
|
Filing 11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Elizabeth Marcus re Brief in Support of a Motion, #9 disk of Video Exhibit 5 (Hubbard, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFICATE of compliance re word count for Brief in Support of a Motion, #9 filed by Elizabeth Marcus (Hubbard, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 9
BRIEF in support of MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) #8 filed by Elizabeth Marcus (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5) (Hubbard, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by defendant Elizabeth Marcus; (Hubbard, Thomas) Modified text on 2/23/2023 (eod)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS returned executed; Elizabeth Marcus served on 2/2/2023, answer due 2/23/2023 (Zietlow, Mark)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Elizabeth Marcus (eod)
|
|
Filing 5
PROPOSED SUMMONS by plaintiff James Cooley (Zietlow, Mark) Modified text on 1/26/2023 (eod)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE Jury Demand by plaintiff James Cooley (Zietlow, Mark)
|
|
Filing 3
REPORT from the Clerk, WDMI, to the Register of Copyrights on the filing of a COPYRIGHT ACTION (eod)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Hala Y. Jarbou ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (eod)
|
|
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Elizabeth Marcus (none provided and filing fee due) (eod)
|
|
Copy of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright #3 with copy of complaint #1 sent via U.S. Mail to Register of Copyrights (eod) Modified text on 1/25/2023 (eod)
|
|
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff James Cooley in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6960620 (Zietlow, Mark)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand with Exhibits 1-6 against Morgan Cooley filed by James Cooley (Zietlow, Mark) Modified text on 1/25/2023 (eod)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
