Davis v. OX Paperboard Michigan, LLC
| Clarence Davis Jr. and Clarence Davis, Jr. |
| OX Paperboard Michigan, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00213 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to complaint #1 Limited Reliance Upon and Objection to Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by OX Paperboard Michigan, LLC (Butler, Kay) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Zeth David Hearld on behalf of defendant OX Paperboard Michigan, LLC (Hearld, Zeth) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Clarence Davis, Jr as to All Defendants (Asch, Marc) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant OX Paperboard Michigan, LLC (pjw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Hala Y. Jarbou (pjw) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Asch, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Clarence Davis, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue) (Asch, Marc) Modified text on 3/1/2023 (pjw). |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Clarence Davis Jr. in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6992439 (Asch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
