Finch v. Perrigo Company et al
| Scott Finch |
| Perrigo Company and Perrigo Company, PLC |
| 1:2023cv00314 |
| March 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Robert J Jonker |
| Ray Kent |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 BRIEF in support of MOTION for summary judgment #14 filed by Perrigo Company, Perrigo Company, PLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1 to Potter Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Potter Declaration, #4 Exhibit 3 to Potter Declaration, #5 Exhibit 4 to Potter Declaration, #6 Exhibit 5 to Potter Declaration, #7 Exhibit 6 to Potter Declaration, #8 Exhibit 7 to Potter Declaration, #9 Exhibit 8 to Potter Declaration, #10 Exhibit 9 to Potter Declaration, #11 Exhibit 10 to Potter Declaration, #12 Exhibit 11 to Potter Declaration, #13 Exhibit 12 to Potter Declaration, #14 Exhibit 13 to Potter Declaration, #15 Exhibit 14 to Potter Declaration, #16 Exhibit 15 to Potter Declaration, #17 Exhibit 16 to Potter Declaration, #18 Exhibit 17 to Potter Declaration, #19 Exhibit 18 to Potter Declaration, #20 Exhibit 19 to Potter Declaration, #21 Exhibit 20 to Potter Declaration, #22 Exhibit 21 to Potter Declaration) (Bardelli, Edward) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for summary judgment by defendants Perrigo Company, Perrigo Company, PLC; (Bardelli, Edward) |
| Filing 13 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Bardelli, Edward) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Perrigo Company, PLC (Brookins, Daniel) Modified text on 5/9/2023 (slk). |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Perrigo Company, PLC (Brookins, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Perrigo Company (Brookins, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 Defendants' ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by Perrigo Company, Perrigo Company, PLC (Brookins, Daniel) |
Filing 8
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 6/2/2023 at 10:00 AM at 699 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Robert J. Jonker; joint status report due by 5/26/2023; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam)
|
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Daniel Brookins on behalf of defendants Perrigo Company, Perrigo Company, PLC (Brookins, Daniel) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Edward J. Bardelli on behalf of defendants Perrigo Company, Perrigo Company, PLC (Bardelli, Edward) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed; Perrigo Company served on 4/12/2023, answer due 5/3/2023; Perrigo Company, PLC served on 4/12/2023, answer due 5/3/2023 (Young, Jesse) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Perrigo Company, PLC (slk) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Young, Jesse) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Perrigo Company (slk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Robert J. Jonker (slk) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Young, Jesse) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Scott Finch (Young, Jesse) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Scott Finch in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7016053 (Young, Jesse) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jenna Sheena on behalf of plaintiff Scott Finch (Sheena, Jenna) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Perrigo Company, PLC (not provided at the time of filing) (slk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
