Shahrour v. Mayorkas et al
| Nizar Shahrour |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Kenneth S. Madsen and Ted H. Kim |
| 1:2023cv00354 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Jane M Beckering |
| Ray Kent |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Kenneth S. Madsen, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (slk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Jane M. Beckering (slk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus against Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Kenneth S. Madsen, Alejandro Mayorkas filed by Nizar Shahrour (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Table of Exhibits & Exhibit A, #3 Summons Civil Process Clerk, #4 Summons Alejandro Mayorkas, #5 Summons Merrick Garland, #6 Summons Ur Mendoza Jaddou, #7 Summons Kenneth S. Madsen, #8 Summons Ted H. Kim) (Green, Brian) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Nizar Shahrour in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7024754 (Green, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
