Barbieri et al v. Jeitschko et al
| Nathan Barbieri and Nolan Radomski |
| Thomas Jeitschko, Judith Whipple and Amy Wisner |
| 1:2023cv00525 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Hannah Rose Brefeld on behalf of defendant Amy Wisner (Brefeld, Hannah) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Deborah A. Lujan on behalf of defendant Amy Wisner (Lujan, Deborah) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Nathan Barbieri, Nolan Radomski as to Amy Wisner waiver sent on 6/29/2023, answer due 8/28/2023 (Spena, Paul) |
Filing 10
STIPULATION AND ORDER; deadline for defendants Thomas Jeitschko and Judith Whipple to file responsive pleading and response to motion for preliminary injunction extended to 7/20/2023; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time to File First Responsive Pleading and Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction by defendants Thomas Jeitschko, Judith Whipple (Watza, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION AND ORDER; deadline for defendants Thomas Jeitschko and Judith Whipple to file responsive pleading and response to motion for preliminary injunction extended to 7/6/2023; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time to File First Responsive Pleading and Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction by defendants Thomas Jeitschko, Judith Whipple [Attorney Elizabeth M. Watza added to party Thomas Jeitschko(pty:dft), Attorney Elizabeth M. Watza added to party Judith Whipple(pty:dft)] (Watza, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed; Thomas Jeitschko served on 5/22/2023, answer due 6/12/2023; Judith Whipple served on 5/22/2023, answer due 6/12/2023 (Langhofer, Tyson) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Tyson Charles Langhofer on behalf of plaintiffs Nathan Barbieri, Nolan Radomski (Langhofer, Tyson) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Thomas Jeitschko, Judith Whipple, Amy Wisner (mlc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Paul L. Maloney (mlc) |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction #2 filed by Nathan Barbieri, Nolan Radomski (Spena, Paul) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for preliminary injunction by plaintiffs Nathan Barbieri, Nolan Radomski; (Spena, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Nathan Barbieri, Nolan Radomski (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - GoFundMe - A. Wisner, #2 Exhibit B - Cancel the Patriarchy Pricing, #3 Exhibit C - Rebellion Book pre-order, #4 Exhibit D - Cancel the Patriarchy IG, #5 Exhibit E - Rebellion Book, #6 Exhibit F - MKT 250 Syllabus, #7 Exhibit G - The Rebellion, #8 Exhibit H - A. Wisner IG post 2022.06.25, #9 Exhibit I - RV post, #10 Exhibit J - The Rebellion MKT-specific, #11 Exhibit K - The Rebellion - open space, #12 Exhibit L - TheRebellionOnline IG post, 2022.06.25, #13 Exhibit M - J. Van Hof email, 2023.03.01, #14 Summons to T. Jeitschko, J. Whipple, A. Wisner) (Spena, Paul) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Nathan Barbieri, Nolan Radomski in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7062458 (Spena, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
