Ball v. Robinson
| Steven Ball |
| Mary Jo Robinson |
| 1:2023cv00649 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Jane M Beckering |
| Sally J Berens |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendant Mary Jo Robinson for First Set of Interrogatories and Requests to Produce (Kadado, Charles) |
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw)
|
| Filing 10 MINUTES of scheduling conference by telephone held before District Judge Jane M. Beckering (Court Reporter: not recorded) (rmw) |
| Filing 9 (RESTRICTED ACCESS) DOCUMENT (instructions for 8/9/2023 telephonic scheduling conference) [Access to this document is available to the Court and attorney(s) for Steven Ball, Mary Jo Robinson only] (rmw) |
| Filing 8 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Fawaz, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 8/9/2023 at 01:30 PM by telephone before District Judge Jane M. Beckering; joint status report due by 8/2/2023; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by Mary Jo Robinson (Wassom, Brian) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Charles C. Kadado on behalf of defendant Mary Jo Robinson (Kadado, Charles) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Brian D. Wassom on behalf of defendant Mary Jo Robinson (Wassom, Brian) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by plaintiff Steven Ball re Summons Issued #4 ; Mary Jo Robinson served on 6/23/2023, answer due 7/14/2023 (Fawaz, Michael) Modified text on 7/6/2023 (mg). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Mary Jo Robinson (mg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Jane M. Beckering (mg) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Fawaz, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Mary Jo Robinson filed by Steven Ball (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Settlement Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Police Report, #3 Exhibit 3 - Defamatory Texts) (Fawaz, Michael) |
| RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number AMIWDC-7091199; filing fee paid by attorney Michael Owen Fawaz on behalf of filer (jmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ball v. Robinson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Ball | |
| Represented By: | Michael Owen Fawaz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mary Jo Robinson | |
| Represented By: | Brian D. Wassom |
| Represented By: | Charles C. Kadado |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
