Robinson #232275 v. Dwyer et al
Plaintiff: Lamont Robinson #232275
Defendant: Unknown Dwyer and M. Williams
Case Number: 1:2023cv00863
Filed: August 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Jane M Beckering
Referring Judge: Phillip J Green
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2023 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendants Unknown Dwyer, M. Williams re Attorney Appearance (Limited) (Raines, Austin)
September 12, 2023 (NON-DOCUMENT) LIMITED ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Austin Curtis Raines on behalf of defendants Unknown Dwyer, M. Williams for purposes of the Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation Early Mediation Program (Raines, Austin)
August 29, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to District Judge Jane M. Beckering and Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green for all further proceedings (pjw)
August 29, 2023 Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case to DJ (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Lamont Robinson #232275 (jjm)
August 28, 2023 Filing 5 STATEMENT RE CONSENT by plaintiff Lamont Robinson #232275 requesting the case be assigned to a district judge (pjw)
August 23, 2023 Copy of Order Staying Case and Referring to Early Mediation Program #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Lamont Robinson #232275 (pjw)
August 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER STAYING CASE and referring to EARLY MEDIATION: case is stayed for 120 days to allow parties to participate in mediation; IFP is granted; the 90-day period for service is tolled; the MI Attorney General shall enter a limited appearance by September 12, 2023; w/attached Protocol; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jal)
August 18, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 9/8/2023 (pjw)
August 18, 2023 Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Lamont Robinson #232275 (pjw)
August 16, 2023 Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (pjw)
August 16, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Lamont Robinson #232275 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (pjw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson #232275 v. Dwyer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lamont Robinson #232275
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Dwyer
Represented By: Austin Curtis Raines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Williams
Represented By: Austin Curtis Raines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?