Knox v. Jordan et al
| Furquan Knox |
| Ingham County, Cody Jordan and Ingham, County of |
| 1:2023cv01047 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou and Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens for all further proceedings (ems) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Ingham, County of, Cody Jordan (ems) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 10/25/2023 (ems) |
| Filing 3 (DISREGARD) NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 10/25/2023 (ems) Modified text on 10/4/2023 (ems). |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) NOTICE that Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #3 was filed in error and should be disregarded (ems) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Bostic, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Furquan Knox (Bostic, J.) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Furquan Knox in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7179907 (Bostic, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
