Hale et al v. Clinton, County of et al
Christopher Fisher, Dana Hale and William Pruesner |
Clinton County, Chad Bashore, Jeffrey Armbrustmacher, Devin Hummel, Alexis Chapko, Chad Hallock, John Does, Clinton, County of and Unknown Part(y)(ies) |
1:2023cv01063 |
October 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Jane M Beckering |
Phillip J Green |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ANSWER to affirmative defenses by plaintiffs Dana Hale, William Pruesner re #13 (Colella, A.) |
Filing 14 ORDER setting status/scheduling conference:Status/scheduling conference is set for 1/3/2024 at 01:00 PM at 499 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green; status report due by 12/29/2023; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and reliance on jury demand by Jeffrey Armbrustmacher, Chad Bashore, Alexis Chapko, Clinton, County of, Chad Hallock, Devin Hummel (Ferrand, Timothy) Modified text on 12/4/2023 (pjw) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Timothy Ferrand on behalf of defendants Jeffrey Armbrustmacher, Chad Bashore, Alexis Chapko, Clinton, County of, Chad Hallock, Devin Hummel (Ferrand, Timothy) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS returned executed; Jeffrey Armbrustmacher served on 10/25/2023, answer due 11/15/2023 (Colella, A.) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed; Clinton, County of served on 10/30/2023, answer due 11/20/2023 (Colella, A.) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Aristidi Demetrios Papaioannou on behalf of plaintiff William Pruesner Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs (Papaioannou, Aristidi) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed; Chad Bashore served on 10/29/2023, answer due 11/20/2023 (Colella, A.) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed; Alexis Chapko served on 10/25/2023, answer due 11/15/2023 (Colella, A.) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed; Chad Hallock served on 10/25/2023, answer due 11/15/2023 (Colella, A.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to District Judge Jane M. Beckering and Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green for all further proceedings (pjw) |
Filing 6 STATEMENT RE CONSENT by plaintiff Dana Hale requesting the case be assigned to a district judge (Colella, A.) Modified text on 10/30/2023 (pjw) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Jeffrey Armbrustmacher, Chad Bashore, Alexis Chapko, Clinton, County of, Chad Hallock, Devin Hummel, Unknown Part(y)(ies) (ns) |
Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Colella, A.) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 10/31/2023 (pjw) |
Filing 2 (DISREGARD) NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 10/31/2023 (pjw) Modified text on 10/10/2023; incomplete entry (pjw) |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Jeffrey Armbrustmacher, Chad Bashore, Alexis Chapko, Clinton, County of, Chad Hallock, Devin Hummel (none provided) (pjw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by William Pruesner, Dana Hale (Colella, A.) Modified text on 10/10/2023 (pjw) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Dana Hale and William Pruesner in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7183196 (Colella, A.) Modified text on 10/10/2023 (pjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.