United States of America v. $20,532 United States Currency
United States of America |
$20,532 United States Currency |
Joseph Parsons |
1:2023cv01133 |
October 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Phillip J Green |
Robert J Jonker |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLAIM by Joseph Parsons (McGraw, Daniel) |
Filing 8 PRO SE CLAIM of Joseph Parsons by United States of America (McGraw, Daniel) Modified text on 11/21/2023 (pjw) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiff United States of America for Warrant for Arrest in Rem (McGraw, Daniel) |
Filing 6 NOTICE re #1 of Complaint for Forfeiture by plaintiff United States of America (McGraw, Daniel) |
Filing 5 NOTICE that the Clerk has randomly selected Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green to be available in the event any non-dispositive pretrial matters are referred for determination under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) (ns) |
Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Robert J. Jonker (pjw) |
Filing 2 ORDER OF RECUSAL: case to be reassigned; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT for Forfeiture in Rem against $20,532 United States Currency filed by United States of America (McGraw, Daniel) Modified text on 10/31/2023 (pjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.