Dowdell v. Michigan, State of
Petitioner: Lawrence James Dowdell
Respondent: Michigan, State of
Case Number: 1:2023cv01151
Filed: October 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Ray Kent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2023 Copy of Order Rejecting Pleading #9 with original document sent via U.S. Mail to Lawrence James Dowdell (klb)
December 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REJECTING Civil Action submitted by Lawrence J. Dowdell; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document) (fhw)
December 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (DISREGARD) ORDER REJECTING Civil Action submitted by Lawrence J. Dowdell; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw) Modified text on 12/14/2023 - document did not attach (slk).
December 12, 2023 Copy of Order Rejecting Pleading #7 with original documents sent via U.S. Mail to Lawrence James Dowdell (jmw)
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REJECTING Motion submitted by Lawrence James Dowdell; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document) (fhw)
December 7, 2023 Copy of Order Dismissing Case (no motion) #5 , Judgment Dismissing Case #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Lawrence James Dowdell (jmw)
December 6, 2023 Filing 6 JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE for failure to cure deficiency; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
November 17, 2023 STATEMENT RE CONSENT by petitioner Lawrence James Dowdell consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (as taken from #4 ) (eod)
November 17, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE to assign consent and regarding financial status (not on the proper form) by petitioner Lawrence James Dowdell (slk)
November 1, 2023 Copy of Deficiency Order #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Lawrence James Dowdell (eod)
October 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER: petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 11/28/2023 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
October 31, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE to petitioner regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 11/21/2023 (eod)
October 31, 2023 Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Lawrence James Dowdell (eod)
October 30, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Lawrence James Dowdell (eod)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dowdell v. Michigan, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lawrence James Dowdell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michigan, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?