Wagaman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Karen Marie Wagaman |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration |
1:2023cv01367 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Sally J Berens |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Sarah E. Preston on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Preston, Sarah) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION adding attorney Carolyn Almassian in the place of Michael Shiparski (Almassian, Carolyn) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jln) |
Filing 3 NOTICE regarding transmission of complaint, service and answer; that this case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (ems) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Eddy Pierre Pierre on behalf of plaintiff Karen Marie Wagaman (Pierre Pierre, Eddy) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Karen Marie Wagaman; (Lamey, Wesley) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Karen Marie Wagaman (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lamey, Wesley) Modified text on 12/29/2023 (ems). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.