MacDonald et al v. South Haven, City of et al
Lisa MacDonald and Stephen Ernster |
City of South Haven, South Haven, City of and Unknown Party |
1:2024cv00007 |
January 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Jane M Beckering |
Sally J Berens |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER granting STIPULATION #12 ; Defendants' responsive pleadings due 3/4/2024; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw) |
Filing 12 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to File Responsive Pleadings to Amended Complaint by defendant South Haven, City of (Beindit, Thomas) Modified text on 2/13/2024 (ems). |
Filing 11 ORDER dismissing as moot motion to dismiss #4 ; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (lep) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF MAILING of Summons upon defendant South Haven, City of via certified mail filed by Lisa MacDonald, Stephen Ernster (summons was not issued by Clerk's Office) (Marienfeld, Ronald) Modified text on 2/13/2024 (ems). |
Filing 9 PROOF OF MAILING of Summons upon party Unknown Party via 1st Class Mail filed by Lisa MacDonald (summons was not issued by Clerk's Office) (Marienfeld, Ronald) Modified text on 1/31/2024 (ems). |
Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (with Exhibits A-H) against South Haven, City of, Unknown Party filed by Lisa MacDonald, Stephen Ernster (Attachments: #1 Amended Summons) (Marienfeld, Ronald) Modified text on 1/31/2024 (ems). |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Unknown Party (proposed summons has not been provided by filing party) (ems) |
Filing 7 ORDER: plaintiffs must file an amended complaint or a response to the motion to dismiss; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (lep) |
Filing 6 EXHIBITS re #4 of Unpublished Authorities to Motion to Dismiss by defendant South Haven, City of (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Askew v City of Memphis, #2 Exhibit 2 - Bringman v Vill. of Fredericktown, Ohio, #3 Exhibit 3 - Est. of Abbey v Herring, #4 Exhibit 4 - George v City of Winchester, #5 Exhibit 5 - Kukoleck v Lake Cty. Sheriff's Off., #6 Exhibit 6 - Mitchell v Cty. of Ottawa) (Beindit, Thomas) Modified text on 1/16/2024 (ems). |
Filing 5 BRIEF in support of MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim #4 with Proof of Service and Certificate of Compliance filed by South Haven, City of (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - City of South Haven's Financial Records, #2 Exhibit 2 - City of South Haven's Beach and Pier Safety Plan, #3 Exhibit 3 - City of South Haven's Weather Conditions) (Beindit, Thomas) |
Filing 4 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim by defendant South Haven, City of; (Beindit, Thomas) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Andrew James Brege on behalf of defendant South Haven, City of (Brege, Andrew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Jane M. Beckering (ems) |
Filing 2 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant South Haven, City of re Notice of Removal #1 (Beindit, Thomas) Modified text on 1/3/2024 (ems). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Van Buren County Circuit Court case number 23-073478-NO filed by South Haven, City of (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Document(s) Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Civil Cover Sheet) (Beindit, Thomas) Modified text on 1/3/2024 (ems). |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant South Haven, City of in the amount of $405, receipt number AMIWDC-7256593 (Beindit, Thomas) Modified text on 1/3/2024 (ems). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.