Asbury v. Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff: Charles Asbury
Defendant: DuHadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc. doing business as DK Security
Other: Facilitative Mediator
Case Number: 1:2024cv00028
Filed: January 10, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Hala Y Jarbou
Referring Judge: Ray Kent
2 Judge: Paul L Maloney
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2024 Filing 12 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from Michigan Eastern, their case number 2:23-cv-12696; the documents listed above were electronically transferred to the Western District of Michigan (mlc)
January 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STIPULATED ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Western District of Michigan. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DAll) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
December 19, 2023 Minute Entry for telephonic proceedings before Magistrate Judge David R. Grand: Telephonic Status Conference held on 12/19/2023.Disposition: On December 19, 2023, the Court held a telephonic status conference with counsel to the parties. It was agreed that counsel will meet and confer and file a proposed Rule 26 discovery plan by January 19, 2024. The Court will schedule a telephonic status conference once the discovery plan is filed. (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (EBut) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
December 15, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon M. H. Schumacher on behalf of Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc.. (Schumacher, Brandon) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
December 13, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 12/19/2023 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge David R. Grand; Status Conference set for 12/19/2023 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge David R. Grand; (EBut) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.] Modified text on 1/10/2024 (mlc)
December 1, 2023 Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc. (Butterer, Karl) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
December 1, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Reliance Upon Jury Demand by Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc.. (Butterer, Karl) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
December 1, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Karl W. Butterer, Jr on behalf of Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc.. (Butterer, Karl) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
November 16, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc. served on 11/10/2023, answer due 12/1/2023. (Young, Jesse) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
October 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Referring Matters for Full Pretrial to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
October 25, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc.* (MCho) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
October 25, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at # (MCho) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.] Modified text on 1/10/2024 (mlc)
October 24, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin J. Stoops on behalf of Charles Asbury. (Stoops, Kevin) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.]
October 24, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT "collective and class action complaint" filed by Charles Asbury against Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9538239 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Genesee - County Where Action Arose: Genesse - County of 1st Defendant: Kent. Previously dismissed case: No Possible companion case(s): None (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join, Asbury) (Young, Jesse) [Transferred from Michigan Eastern on 1/10/2024.] Modified text on 1/10/2024 (mlc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asbury v. Duhadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Asbury
Represented By: Kevin J. Stoops
Represented By: Jesse Lee Randolph Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DuHadway, Kendall & Associates, Inc. doing business as DK Security
Represented By: Brandon M.H. Schumacher
Represented By: Karl W. Butterer, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Other: Facilitative Mediator
Represented By: Lynn Cohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?