Gray #651805 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Nijyal S. Gray #651805 |
Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan Department of Health & Human Services and Unknown Logan |
1:2024cv00168 |
February 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Phillip J Green |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT from Eastern District of Michigan, of receipt of WDMI transfer case, assigning case number 2:24-cv-10526 (mlc) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Michigan; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw) |
CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED to Eastern District of Michigan (mlc) |
Copy of Order Transferring Case to the Eastern District of Michigan #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Nijyal S. Gray #651805 (mlc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (mlc) |
Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Nijyal S. Gray #651805 (mlc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Nijyal S. Gray #651805; (mlc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Nijyal S. Gray #651805 (Attachments: #1 MDOC forms) (mlc) |
STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Nijyal S. Gray #651805 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (mlc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.