Simpson-Tuegel et al v. White, et al
Plaintiff: Michelle Simpson-Tuegel and The Simpson Tuegel Law Firm, PLLC
Defendant: White Law, PLLC and James White
Case Number: 1:2024cv00169
Filed: February 20, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Jane M Beckering
Referring Judge: Phillip J Green
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2024 Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT by defendants James White, White Law, PLLC (Morgan, Thaddeus)
March 25, 2024 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Aaron J. Scheinfield on behalf of defendants James White, White Law, PLLC (Scheinfield, Aaron)
March 6, 2024 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by White Law, PLLC as to White Law, PLLC waiver sent on 2/22/2024, answer due 4/22/2024 (Morgan, Thaddeus)
March 6, 2024 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by James White as to James White waiver sent on 2/22/2024, answer due 4/22/2024 (Morgan, Thaddeus)
March 6, 2024 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Thaddeus E. Morgan on behalf of defendants James White, White Law, PLLC (Morgan, Thaddeus)
February 21, 2024 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Simpson Tuegel Law Firm, PLLC (Knapp, Scott)
February 21, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants James White, White Law, PLLC (mg)
February 21, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Jane M. Beckering ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re corporate disclosure statement (mg)
February 20, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michelle Simpson-Tuegel, The Simpson Tuegel Law Firm, PLLC (Attachments: #1 Summons to James White, #2 Summons to White Law PLLC) (Knapp, Scott)
February 20, 2024 FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Michelle Simpson-Tuegel, The Simpson Tuegel Law Firm, PLLC in the amount of $405, receipt number AMIWDC-7297777 (Knapp, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpson-Tuegel et al v. White, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Simpson-Tuegel
Represented By: Scott R. Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Simpson Tuegel Law Firm, PLLC
Represented By: Scott R. Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: White Law, PLLC
Represented By: Aaron J. Scheinfield
Represented By: Thaddeus E. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James White
Represented By: Aaron J. Scheinfield
Represented By: Thaddeus E. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?