Gray #651805 v. Glenn et al
| Nijyal S. Gray #651805 |
| Unknown Glenn, Unknown Costello, Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Parties and Chad Brown |
| 1:2024cv00204 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT from Eastern District of Michigan, of receipt of WDMI transfer case, assigning case number 1:24-cv-11115 (slk) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Michigan; signed by Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (fhw)
|
| Copy of Order Transferring Case to the Eastern District of Michigan #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Nijyal S. Gray (slk) |
| CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED to Eastern District of Michigan (slk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of receipt of case (jjm) |
| Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Nijyal S. Gray #651805 (klb) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (jjm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chad Brown, Unknown Costello, Unknown Glenn, Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Parties filed by Nijyal S. Gray #651805 (jjm) |
| STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Nijyal S. Gray #651805 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (jjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
