Pittman v. Social Security, Commissioner of
| Kim Antonio Pittman |
| Social Security, Commissioner of and Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2024cv00241 |
| March 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Sarah E. Preston on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Preston, Sarah) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE regarding transmission of complaint, service and answer; that this case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (eod) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents Exhibit A, Checking - Savings Bank Statements of the Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B, Affidavit of Licensed Medical Professional on Plaintiff's Work Restrictions, #3 Financial Documents Exhibit C, W2 2023 Plaintiff Income of Failed Work Attempt) (Kipa, Nicholas) Modified on 3/11/2024 (eod). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security, Commissioner of filed by Kim Antonio Pittman (Kipa, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
