Hoek v. Bissell Homecare, Inc.

Plaintiff: Stacy Hoek
Defendant: Bissell Homecare, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2024cv00273
Filed: March 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Sally J Berens
Referring Judge: Robert J Jonker
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2024 Filing 11 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Stoops, Kevin)
April 24, 2024 Filing 10 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses by Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Brookins, Daniel)
April 24, 2024 Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bissell Homecare, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent BISSELL Inc for Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Brookins, Daniel)
April 24, 2024 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Paulina Rose Kennedy on behalf of plaintiff Stacy Hoek (Kennedy, Paulina)
April 17, 2024 Filing 8 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 5/20/2024 at 02:00 PM at 699 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Robert J. Jonker; joint status report due by 5/13/2024; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam)
April 17, 2024 Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 motion for extension of time to answer; this action is extended to 4/30/2024; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (elam)
April 15, 2024 Filing 6 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER for extension of time to file answer re #1 by defendant Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Pacific, Dean) Modified text on 4/16/2024 (pjw)
April 11, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; Bissell Homecare, Inc. served on 3/26/2024, answer due 4/16/2024 (Young, Jesse)
April 11, 2024 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Daniel Brookins on behalf of defendant Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Brookins, Daniel)
April 9, 2024 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Dean F. Pacific on behalf of defendant Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Pacific, Dean)
March 15, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Bissell Homecare, Inc. (pjw)
March 15, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Robert J. Jonker (pjw)
March 15, 2024 Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Young, Jesse)
March 15, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Bissell Homecare, Inc. filed by Stacy Hoek (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent to Join, Hoek) (Young, Jesse)
March 15, 2024 FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Stacy Hoek in the amount of $405, receipt number AMIWDC-7321306 (Young, Jesse)
March 15, 2024 (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Kevin J. Stoops on behalf of plaintiff Stacy Hoek (Stoops, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoek v. Bissell Homecare, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Hoek
Represented By: Kevin J. Stoops
Represented By: Jesse Lee Randolph Young
Represented By: Paulina Rose Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bissell Homecare, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Brookins
Represented By: Dean F. Pacific
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?