Cantin et al v. Ingham County et al
| Anthony Cantin, Athel Curtis, Michael Freeman, Susan Freeman, Brent Maffett, Gordon Zeigler and Clyde Zeigler |
| Ingham, County of, Alan Fox and Eric Schertzing |
| 1:2024cv00322 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Defendants from Ingham County Circuit case number 24-173-CZ filed by Ingham County, Eric Schertzing, Alan Fox (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint) (Shenouda, Magy) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Donovan James Visser on behalf of plaintiffs Anthony Cantin, Athel Curtis, Michael Freeman, Susan Freeman, Brent Maffett, Clyde Zeigler, Gordon Zeigler (Visser, Donovan) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Donald R. Visser on behalf of plaintiffs Anthony Cantin, Athel Curtis, Michael Freeman, Susan Freeman, Brent Maffett, Clyde Zeigler, Gordon Zeigler (Visser, Donald) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Charles Allen Lawler on behalf of defendants Alan Fox, Ingham, County of, Eric Schertzing (Lawler, Charles) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendants Alan Fox, Ingham County, Eric Schertzing in the amount of $405, receipt number AMIWDC-7332447 (Shenouda, Magy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
